Unité 20 | Ressource Texte
The spies who struggle to love James Bond
Press article : Despite his obvious failings, 007 highlights what the secret services are up against
Opinion British Secret Intelligence Service
The spies who struggle to love James Bond
Despite his obvious failings, 007 highlights what the secret services are up against
HELEN WARRELL DECEMBER 20 2021
There are moments in the latest Bond film when art imitates life a little too closely. No Time to Die involves a deadly bioweapon, which is unnerving during a raging pandemic. The fictional MI6 chief, known as “M”, bemoans1 the fact that the world is arming “faster than we can respond”, and that the enemy, once a flesh-and-blood adversary, is now “floating in the ether2”. These same complaints are made frequently by real-life defence and intelligence personnel grappling with AI, cyber attacks and the prospect of high-tech warfare.
But if Britain’s security establishment is grateful that Hollywood is highlighting such threats, it is careful not to show it. In fact, the Bond films have always been a mixed blessing for UK spies. The caricature of a misogynist action man risks deterring3 the female and non-white, non-Oxbridge candidates that MI5, MI6 and GCHQ are now urging to join their ranks. Meanwhile, those who apply to the agencies in droves4 after each new film release are often unsuited to a career in modern espionage. The hard-drinking, gambling, libidinous, indiscriminate killer of 007 fame “is not the type of candidate we’re after”, one security official notes drily.
For this reason, MI6 is wary of admiring its fictional — and most famous — officer too much. Alex Younger, former head of the foreign intelligence agency, admitted five years ago he was “conflicted” about the films, and said if Bond were to join now, “he would have to change his ways”. The current chief, Richard Moore, has coined a twitter hashtag, #forgetjamesbond, to promote his drive for a more diverse workforce. Meanwhile, Ken McCallum, director-general of the domestic intelligence service MI5, explained last year that launching a profile on Instagram would help his agency “get past whatever martini-drinking stereotypes may be lingering” to convey a better sense of what life in the service is actually like.
But maybe these spy chiefs protest too much. The benefits of Bond for Britain’s soft power, and the image of its spies as skilled, respected and omnipotent, is still a net positive. One Whitehall official tells me that the brand is “hugely useful” when recruiting agents — the men and women who risk their lives to pass intelligence from inside key targets such as terror cells. Bond is an “immediate reference point” for the idea of taking risks for a greater good, the official explains. The budget of Hollywood’s MI6 may be limitless, but this is no bad thing. “We are painted in the minds of a global audience as some form of ubiquitous5 intelligence presence,” Younger conceded in a letter to The Economist four years ago. “This can be quite a force multiplier.” (…)
While Britain’s security services don’t need to run a contest, No Time to Die is potentially a film they can get behind. Bond is humbler and more vulnerable than earlier incarnations, his lothario6 instincts softened by age and experience. He is now, as the FT’s film critic says, “a wrecked old spook7 with one functional knee”. The charismatic Nomi, a young, black, rising star of MI6 — who regards Bond with sardonic wariness and outsmarts him — is a far better role model for the future of espionage than her clapped-out predecessor.
Still, modernisation only goes so far. Bond’s vintage cars, on-the-spot assassinations and enthusiasm for drinking on operations persist. His Aston Martin is deployed in a lightning car chase through the vertiginous streets of Matera, and he later enters the villain’s island lair in a stealth8 glider designed by Q branch which transforms into an underwater submersible. In these scenes at least, it is reassuring that the fantasy world of 007 remains largely untroubled by real life.
1.bemoan: complain about 2. ether: atmosphere/sky 3. deterring: discourage
4. in droves: many people 5.ubiquitous: omnipresent 6. lothario: a man who seduces women 7. “wrecked old spook”: damaged old ghost 8. stealth: moving undetected
Questions :
1. List the reasons why the British secret service doesn't like 007 so much.
2. Pick out the positive aspects the Bond movie brings to the agency.
3. Explain the modern and changing elements in the last Bond movie that make it more interesting according to Britain’s security establishment.
4. Interaction: act out an interview from a journalist and an MI6 agent. Ask questions about how the agent feel about the last 007 movie, what kind of image this is portraying of the actual agency. Discuss the symbols of power displayed in spy movies and how 007 movies have been a big part of promoting a positive and strong image of Great Britain.
Crédits :
© Financial Times 2020 / HELEN WARRELL